$10,500 for a bottle of perfume made with 8,000 flowers? Synthetic biology makes royal fragrances available at a fraction of that price
$10,500 for a bottle of perfume made with 8,000 flowers? Synthetic biology makes royal fragrances available at a fraction of that price
Perfume has historically been the indulgence of the rich. Many of the ingredients used by the nobility to scent the bodies and quarters are rare, hard to source, and require massive amounts of material to produce. For example, it takes 252,000 individual petals (or 8,000 flowers) to produce just 5 milliliters of rose oil. Delicate jasmine flowers are hand-picked in the early hours of dawn to capture their blooming scent. And orange blossoms can only be collected for about two weeks a year due to the short flowering cycle.
Today, perfumers do not have to go to such great lengths to get ingredients. Thanks to the advances in synthetic biology, many of the molecules traditionally sourced from plant or animal materials, can now be produced in engineered microbes using precision fermentation.
Conagen has recognized this huge industry problem and has been working to develop clean, sustainable, and cost-effective natural fragrance ingredients using the power of synthetic biology. With the help of DNA sequencing, gene editing, and precision fermentation, scientists at Conagen are recreating the coveted ingredients from rare plants and animals in lab-grown yeast. They are working in partnership with Sensegen, the Flavor & Fragrance division of Blue California, to identify priorities based on areas of consumer demand and tune the quality, purity, and price of their ingredients.
 | Videos | More... |
Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
 | Bees & Pollinators | More... |
GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it
Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?
Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
 | Infographics | More... |
Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
 | GMO FAQs | More... |
Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?
How are GMOs labeled around the world?
How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
 | GLP Profiles | More... |
Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’
Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta
