7 year study of the effects of GMO corn on primates shows what every other study has found: ‘No significant health risks’
7 year study of the effects of GMO corn on primates shows what every other study has found: ‘No significant health risks’


A study spanning more than seven years has found no significant health risks associated with the long-term consumption of genetically modified (GM) maize in cynomolgus macaques. Conducted across two generations of the non-human primates, the research assessed the impact of GM maize on immune responses and metabolic health.
The study evaluated a GM maize line containing insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant traits (cry1Ab/cry2Aj and G10evo–EPSPS genes). In both generations, the researchers performed detailed analyses on immunoglobulin profiles, cytokine networks, and serum metabolome characteristics. While some minor differences in blood and metabolic parameters emerged, none were deemed biologically or clinically significant. The research also ruled out concerns related to chronic inflammation, autoimmune responses, or toxicity from GM maize.
The findings provide substantial evidence to support the global body of research on the safety of GM crops. While the study did not assess cellular and mucosal immunity, it establishes a methodological framework for longitudinal safety assessments of GM crops. The researchers conclude that the prolonged consumption of GM maize poses no significant health risks.
A version of this article was originally posted at ISAAA.org and is reposted here with permission. Any reposting should credit both the GLP and original article. Find ISAAA.org on X @isaaa_org

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








A single high dose of LSD can ease anxiety and depression for months
CRISPR pork: U.S. approves first gene-edited pigs for consumption
From plastic coasters to human hearts: Inside the race to print the human body
Baby food panic, brought to you by trial lawyers hoping to prosecute by press release
Viewpoint: Life and death decisions: RFK, Jr.’s shady FDA “expert panels” operate in secret with no transcripts or conflict of interest reviews
‘SuperAgers’: Why some people have the brains and memory capacity of people decades younger
From ‘Frankenfood’ to superfood: Can the purple tomato overcome GMO myths to win over consumers?
When farmers deny science: The hypocrisy hurting agriculture’s credibility
GLP podcast: ‘Fight fire with fire.’ How one science advocate converts vaccines skeptics