Countries around the world diverge on how to regulate gene editing crop revolution
Countries around the world diverge on how to regulate gene editing crop revolution


Existing biotech regulations for GMOs have established a very complicated and burdensome regulatory environment in addition to trade barriers without scientific basis which could impact the use of [new breeding techniques, or] NBTs and further developments. It also faces the challenge of acceptance by retailers and consumers, and communication to and from these stakeholders may define the future of these opportunities.
The countries which are most advanced in developing a viable regulatory framework for NBT are the major food and feed producer and exporter countries in Latin America. Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Paraguay, Guatemala, and Honduras already have regulations in place that encourage innovation.

Plant breeding is key to boosting agricultural productivity, adapting agriculture to climate change and improving nutritional food and feed, while providing benefits to consumers, farmers and society at large. Moreover, these technologies are widely accessible and could help democratize the benefits of science. But to leverage their potential and promote further investment and development, it is essential to approach the regulatory, legal and commercial framework from a scientific rather than a political perspective.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here
The GLP featured this article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. The viewpoint is the author’s own. The GLP’s goal is to stimulate constructive discourse on challenging science issues.

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’






Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Four ways to strip carbon out of agriculture and limit farming’s climate impacts
Confronting the elephant in the human biodiversity room — the explosive issue of IQ
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta