‘Do they have an advantage for society and the planet?’: European scientists debate whether the EU should allow CRISPR crops
‘Do they have an advantage for society and the planet?’: European scientists debate whether the EU should allow CRISPR crops


In June this year, the European Commission will issue new advice on the authorization of the use of CRISPR-Cas, a technique for genetic modification (GMO), in crop breeding. In 2018, the EU voted against authorization of use. Resource examines the opportunities and bottlenecks for CRISPR-Cas in crop breeding with four WUR experts.
John van der Oost, professor of microbiology and CRISPR-Cas pioneer says, ‘The fact that CRISPR-Cas techniques are at least as safe as older techniques has now been widely accepted by researchers. Mutagenesis, alteration of the DNA by radiation or chemicals, produces many more unwanted changes in the DNA than CRISPR-Cas. And the EU simply allows that.”
“We must use the technology for good, for example in Norway it has been decided that small DNA adjustments are acceptable, provided they have an advantage for society and the planet. I think that’s worth a try.”
…
“I hope that the authorization of CRISPR-Cas will now be relaxed, it is about time. I am cautiously optimistic. Anyway, I was also optimistic in 2018 and it turned out not to work out as I expected and hoped.”
[Editor’s note: This article has been translated from German and edited for clarity]
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta