Edible insects: Cultures around the globe eat environmentally friendly bug protein. Why shouldn’t the United States?
Edible insects: Cultures around the globe eat environmentally friendly bug protein. Why shouldn’t the United States?


Although edible insects are far from common in American and European cuisines, over 3,000 ethnic groups in 130 countries eat them regularly. While most of the people in these cultures harvest them in the wild, insect farming is also growing in popularity, since it uses less land, water, and feed, and emits fewer greenhouse gas emissions.
Besides the increased sustainability of insect rearing compared to traditional livestock, eating insects also seems to have numerous health benefits. For instance, according to a recent study published in the journal Nature Food, chitin and healthy fats from insects are major sources of proteins and nutrients and could contribute to healthy gut microbiota.
Some of the current article’s key findings include:
- The types of insects consumed among the globe (in areas comprising a total of over two billion people) include beetles, caterpillars, bees, wasps, grasshoppers, ants, true bugs, and termites.
- Although their nutritional profiles vary, most of these insects are rich sources of protein and contain all essential amino acids necessary for human nutrition, particularly those also found in cereal- and legume-based diets.
- There is little evidence that eating insects may present more risks – in terms of allergens or contaminants – than other animal-based products.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta