EU bans food imports with neonic pesticide residues starting in 2026
EU bans food imports with neonic pesticide residues starting in 2026


The European Commission announced [September 27] that imports of products containing residues of harmful insecticides known as neonicotinoids will be banned from 2026, in a move that adds a serious amount of global political heft to the Farm to Fork strategy.
What’s this about? The ban will cover clothianidin and thiamethoxam, two insecticides known to pose a high risk to bees and other pollinators. Their use is already prohibited in the EU — but some countries have found ways to go around the ban and continue spraying them on their fields. Chemical giants also continue to produce neonicotinoids in the EU and export them to be used by non-EU farmers, a practice the Commission has pledged to outlaw by 2023 under its Chemicals Strategy.
Why wait?The new import rules received a green light from national capitals and will be adopted early next year, but the ban won’t go into effect for another three years. This is to give food operators and third countries “sufficient time to adapt,” the Commission said in a statement.
Reactions? The EU’s previous attempts to prohibit harmful insecticides have met with strong opposition from some of the bloc’s major trading partners, including the U.S. The Commission said the new ban respects World Trade Organization standards and obligations and added that it has consulted on the plan with other WTO members.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta