Gene-edited wheat ‘significantly lowers levels of cancer-linked acrylamide which forms when bread is baked or toasted’
Gene-edited wheat ‘significantly lowers levels of cancer-linked acrylamide which forms when bread is baked or toasted’


A strain of gene-edited wheat that could be sold in Britain under a new law has been shown to lower significantly the risk of a cancer-linked compound when bread is baked and toasted.
Researchers at Rothamsted Research in Hertfordshire used a gene-editing technology called CRISPR to “knock out” a gene in the wheat which they hoped would lower formation of asparagine.
Asparagine is an amino acid that, when the wheat is cooked, can be converted to acrylamide, a compound known to cause cancer in animals. In the case of toast, the darker the bread is burnt the greater the risk, but acrylamide is also produced without burning.
The results of the field trial at Rothamsted, for which wheat was sowed in October 2021 and harvested in August 2022, showed that asparagine levels were almost 50 per cent lower in the gene-edited strain than in a control crop.
When the grain was made into flour and baked at 160C, asparagine levels in the gene-edited wheat were up to 45 per cent lower.
“It’s proof of concept certainly, that we can reduce asparagine levels by a lot. Of course it’s only one year’s trial, and we will certainly carry on with field trials. But it looks tremendously positive at the moment,” said Nigel Halford, principal research scientist at Rothamsted.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta