Gene editing targets pathogens that limit rice yields
Gene editing targets pathogens that limit rice yields


In a recent study that examined how diseases function in rice crops, University of Missouri researchers might have found critical answers.
In this study, Bing Yang, a plant biology professor in the MU College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources and the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center used genome editing as a tool to identify problematic pathogens present in certain bacteria that lead to prolific infections in rice crops. His research helps scientists understand how these pathogens function and, thus, can determine how to guard against widespread infections that destroy yields.
This research provides insight into the host-pathogen relationship, allowing scientists to better genetically engineer plants to survive crop diseases.
“Based on the advances in scientific understanding made during this study, we are now able to develop strategies to engineer host-resistance against the bacteria,” Yang said. “That’s how we can support plant resistance in general.”
First, the research team discovered a way to “knock out” genes. When specific genes are knocked out of the bacteria, it allows scientists to better understand the functions of those specific genes. Researchers then tested for infectious properties — something that has historically been a labor-intensive process.
“This research allows us to better understand which bacteria hold pathogenic qualities and how those qualities correspond to infections in certain species of plants,” Yang said. “Ultimately, these advances in gene editing help us modify the genome of crops, in this case rice, in ways that build resistance that protect them from diseases.”
Using a revolutionary gene-editing technique called CRISPR — a method where scientists edit genes by cutting DNA and then letting it repair naturally — Yang and his team edited a sample of bacteria with the goal of determining exactly which genes had pathogenic qualities that would infect proteins in the genome of the rice crop.
Notably, Yang’s method revolutionizes a process known as homologous recombination, which has been known to be ineffective and time-consuming.
“My long-term research goal is a better understanding of the biology of diseases and plant biology and the process of using advanced technology to engineer disease resistance,” Yang said. “I also want to engineer the product so it’s more nutritious and of a higher quantity while increasing a season’s yield and reducing the yield loss.”
As a scholar of plant pathology for more than 15 years, Yang said that bacteria, including those with symbiotic (beneficial) and pathogenic qualities, are essential in maintaining life and the health of our ecosystems.
“Efficient CRISPR-Cas9 based cytosine base editors for phytopathogenic bacteria,” was published in the Communications Biology section of Nature Journal. Co-authors include Chenhao Li, Longfei Wang, Leland J. Cseke, Fernanda Vasconcelos, Jose Carlos Huguet-Tapia, Walter Gassmann, Laurens Pauwels, Frank F. White and Hansong Dong.
This study was partially supported by the United States Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture subawards to MU and University of Florida from the Heinrich Heine University of Dusseldorf.
Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta