How long and how much? Bringing a biotech crop to market costs $116 million and takes 16.5 years
How long and how much? Bringing a biotech crop to market costs $116 million and takes 16.5 years


Farmers are increasingly faced with the need to produce more food from fewer resources and under less predictable growing conditions. They are also tasked with managing the broader landscape within which they farm and mitigating the effects of climate change.
Each year, millions of farmers around the world plant biotech crops for higher yields, improved crop quality, and the ability to use sustainable farming practices such as no-till. Getting these innovative new genetically modified (GM) traits from the lab to their fields requires a tremendous investment from product developers.
- The good news is that the cost of discovery, development, and authorization of a new GM trait has declined by $21 million over the past 10 years. However, more importantly, the time to get these new innovations to market has increased from 13.1 years to 16.5 years.
- Despite product developers improving parts of the research and development process, it is taking them longer to realize a return on their investment. And just as important, it is taking longer to get these new innovations into the hands of farmers.
- This report demonstrates that now more than ever, a more harmonized regulatory framework around the world for GM traits would improve time to market, which promotes innovation and ultimately helps farmers and consumers.
Key findings of the study include
The regulatory phase, the longest duration of the overall process, accounted for almost 40% (37.6%) of the total cost of commercialization and more importantly more than half (51.1%) of the time. This increase in time reflects an increase of almost 140% over the 2008-2012 study and an additional 40 months of lost commercial revenue for product developers.
[Editor’s note: Read the entire report here: Time and Cost to Develop a New GM Trait.]
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta