Indoor plants do not improve air quality very much. Startup Neoplants has a genetic fix
Indoor plants do not improve air quality very much. Startup Neoplants has a genetic fix


Neoplants’s marquee product, announced late last year, is the Neo P1, the first houseplant genetically engineered to remediate indoor air pollution. At first blush, this high-tech pothos—a tropical vine native to the Solomon Islands, also known as “Devil’s Ivy”—is indistinguishable from the real thing. It’s photogenic, fast-growing, and hard to kill. But unlike typical nursery stock, it also metabolizes indoor air pollutants missed by traditional air purifiers, which filter particulate matter: the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by paint, gas stoves, and building materials.
“It’s actually a two-pronged approach,” explains Neoplants’s chief technology officer and cofounder, Patrick Torbey. The first prong is the genetic engineering of the plant’s metabolism. By introducing additional genes into the plant, Torbey’s Paris-based team coaxed the pothos to produce enzymes allowing it to use the VOCs it absorbs as carbon sources in its normal cellular metabolism. In a virtuous cycle, more air pollution only creates more plant matter and greater pollution-fighting capacity.
The second prong is bacterial. In a Neoplant, as in nature, microbes do the heavy lifting; two strains of symbiotic bacteria inserted into the Neo P1’s soil turn formaldehyde and the class of pollutants known as BTEX—benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene—into harmless sugars and amino acids.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta