Monsanto and BASF held liable for farmers who misused older formulations of dicamba, resulting in drift and extensive crop damage
Monsanto and BASF held liable for farmers who misused older formulations of dicamba, resulting in drift and extensive crop damage
The difference between farmers and meth cooks who misuse legal products has proven crucial in a court ruling with far-reaching implications for the biotech industry.
Biotech companies can be held responsible for damages caused by farmers who misuse genetically engineered, herbicide-tolerant seeds or any chemicals sprayed on them, according to a federal appeals court.
The decision distinguishes such biotech companies from pharmaceutical firms, which were previously found not liable for cold medicines being used as methamphetamine ingredients.
Monsanto and BASF failed to convince the 8th U.S. Circuit of Appeals they aren’t liable for damages caused by unlawful dicamba spraying of cotton and soybean crops, which were genetically engineered to tolerate the volatile chemical.
The 8th Circuit has upheld a jury verdict from 2020 that blamed Monsanto and BASF for the herbicide drift that caused millions of dollars in damages to a Missouri peach farm.
Dicamba-resistant cotton and soybeans were approved by the USDA before federal regulators authorized new less-volatile formulations of dicamba that aren’t as prone to drift.
When Monsanto commercialized the GE seeds, “off-label dicamba use exploded” in 2015 and 2016 because farmers used older formulations of the herbicide, the 8th Circuit said.
 | Videos | More... |
Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
 | Bees & Pollinators | More... |
GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it
Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?
Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
 | Infographics | More... |
Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
 | GMO FAQs | More... |
Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?
How are GMOs labeled around the world?
How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
 | GLP Profiles | More... |
Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’
Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta
