Neonicotinoids are restricted or banned in some European countries. Why is it so hard to find safer and more effective alternative pesticides?
Neonicotinoids are restricted or banned in some European countries. Why is it so hard to find safer and more effective alternative pesticides?


The [French] government has just issued a decree authorizing, by way of exemption, the use in 2023 of sugar beet seeds coated with neonicotinoids. The practice has been banned since 2016 by the Biodiversity law, but in the absence of alternatives, crops are at the mercy of aphids and the diseases they transmit. In 2020, jaundice had caused the loss of 35% to 40% of harvests [a yellowing virus introduced by aphids], putting the entire sector in danger. “Whatever happens, this is the last exemption” granted to beet growers, assured, on January 6 on Franceinfo, Christophe Béchu, the Minister of Ecological Transition. “It’s a matter of consistency, health and respect for the environment,” he added.
The Technical Beet Institute (ITB) is working on ways to do without neonicotinoids. So far, nothing deployable on a large scale has come out of laboratories and experimental fields.
“Many statements are made in the media, but concretely, we know that it will be complex, hybrid. It’s a race against time. Currently, the sugar beet industry does not have a solution to prevent the consequences of vector/virosis multiplication like neonicotinoids do.”
[Editor’s note: This article has been translated from French and edited for clarity]
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta