Not The Onion: California Supreme Court rules bumbles are fish — but justices say state species protection act is poorly worded
Not The Onion: California Supreme Court rules bumbles are fish — but justices say state species protection act is poorly worded
The state Supreme Court agreed [September 21] to allow dwindling species of bumblebees to be considered for protection as endangered species in California under a broad reading of a state law that protects fish.
California’s endangered-species law, one of the nation’s first when it was signed by then-Gov. Ronald Reagan in 1970, granted protections to any “bird, mammal, fish, amphibia or reptile” whose existence in the state was threatened, and included “invertebrates” in the definition of fish.
The law has been rewritten since then, but a state appeals court ruled in May that it was flexible enough to allow the state Fish and Game Commission to consider protecting four imperiled species of bees under the category of “fish.”
On [September 21], the state’s high court denied review of an appeal by the farming groups, leaving the appellate ruling in place as a binding precedent for trial courts statewide. Four votes were needed to grant review on the seven-member court, but the only vote to hear the appeal was cast by Justice Patricia Guerrero, who has been chosen by Gov. Gavin Newsom to succeed the retiring Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye.
In an unusual action, three of the six justices who voted to reject the appeal, including Cantil-Sakauye, said the case suggests the law may need to be reworded.
[This] decision does not mean that bees are fish under California law, but only that the appeals court had reasons to conclude, based on the goals of the endangered-species law, that its wording “carries an unusual meaning, peculiar to that law.”This is an excerpt. Read the original post here
 | Videos | More... |
Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
 | Bees & Pollinators | More... |
GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it
Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?
Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
 | Infographics | More... |
Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
 | GMO FAQs | More... |
Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?
How are GMOs labeled around the world?
How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
 | GLP Profiles | More... |
Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’
Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta
