Road to sustainable GMO salmon production: AquaBounty’s endless slog through broken US regulatory system
Road to sustainable GMO salmon production: AquaBounty’s endless slog through broken US regulatory system


Sure, you may have a great idea, but introducing a food product the world has never seen before makes for an extremely hard business case, according to David Melbourne.
“We blazed a trail for genetically engineered animal protein,” said Melbourne, Chief Commercial Officer of AquaBounty Technologies. “We are the first animal protein approved for human consumption in the (United States) and Canada.”
Melbourne was speaking remotely from New Hampshire at the ABIC Speaker Series event hosted by Ag-West Bio in Saskatoon last month.
In what must rank as one of the longest initial-innovation-to-consumer-plates periods ever, the company’s AquAdvantage salmon hit the market in 2021, 32 years after its initial development. About 25 years of this involved navigating the uncharted labyrinths of U.S. and Canadian regulatory authorities.
AquAdvantage salmon is a transgenic, meaning it contains genes from two other fish. The initial work was successfully done in 1989 at Memorial University in Newfoundland and Labrador. Researchers there were trying to solve the problem of salmon farmers losing stock due to cold water periods during the 36 months it took to grow to market weight. They came up with salmon that reached that weight in half the time, dodging the cold while also using less feed. A company, AF Protein (later AquaBounty) was launched to bring the innovation to market.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta