Foods / Tuesday, 09-Sep-2025

Snake oil? Are biologicals used by farmers to treat diseases, fend off pests and enhance soil health effective?

Snake oil? Are biologicals used by farmers to treat diseases, fend off pests and enhance soil health effective?

XLinkedInFacebookRedditBlueskyThreads
Credit: Farm Journal
Credit: Farm Journal
The aim of the European Seed series on Myths, Fake News, Misinformation and Disinformation is to dive deeper, taking a closer look at a variety of seed related topics. This article looks at the myths surrounding biologicals.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Myth: Biologicals are ‘snake oil’

Fact: This is a huge misconception that customers and companies had, which stems from the misunderstanding of biological products as a whole. It should not be forgotten that biological products typically are live organisms. And back in the day, such products didn’t have the best genetics. On top of that, the delivery method that was used for biologicals were quite old-fashioned. Such delivery methods were not friendly to keeping the biological product alive. And so, 20-30 years ago, this led to inconsistent performances. Over the last 20 years, the biological treatment sector has vastly improved. Not only have delivery methods become better, but baseline genetics and our understanding of genetics has greatly improved.

Myth: Biologicals need to be applied multiple times

Fact: The notion that biologicals must be used repeatedly during the growing season to achieve optimal performance is a common fallacy. Do I need to apply my biological on the seed, in the furrow, and then continue to do so again over the top? is an often-asked question.

It is incorrect to believe that biologicals need to be applied multiple times. Numerous organisms in the field are endophytic, meaning they reside inside the plant. Additionally, when you use those organisms as a seed treatment, they successfully colonize both inside and outside of the plant. Long term, this implies that the farmer will receive a season-long reaction to that biological.

The fact that many of these species are endophytic has also allowed scientists to pinpoint the genetics as being host specific. By having an organism that lives inside the plant, environmental elements like soil type, pH, and the availability of nutrients in the soil are actually eliminated from consideration. It makes no difference whether the produce was grown in Country A or Country B. You get a more consistent result from year to year since the organisms are inside the plant.

Consistency and dependability are the key concepts throughout. While it may not have been a given 30 years ago, this is today a feature shared by many biological treatments. Let’s start by educating people to refute the idea that biological sciences are unreliable.

Marcel Bruins is the Editorial Director of European Seed. Find Marcel on Twitter @mbruins123

A version of this article was originally posted at European Seed and is reposted here with permission. European Seed can be found on Twitter @EuropeSeed

combined disclaimer outlined@ x
donation plea outlined@ x
XLinkedInFacebookRedditBlueskyThreads
podcastsGLP Podcasts & Podcast VideosMore...
Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!

v facts and fallacies cameron and liza default featured image outlined

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...
science hand testtube x

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

Genetic Literacy Project
international law x

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

Genetic Literacy Project
two types of breeding x

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?

Genetic Literacy Project
Screen Shot at AM

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’

T H LO

IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer): Glyphosate cancer determination challenged by world consensus

Most Popular

  • Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health

  • Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains

  • Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics

  • Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?

  • California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining

  • 30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus

  • The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs

  • ‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta

Follow Us

Newsletter

Be the first to know about new products and promotions.

Subscribe with your email

Tranding

Tags

trendglee

Fresh, fast, and fun — all the entertainment you need in one place.

© Trendglee. All Rights Reserved. Designed by trendglee