Unlike most of the rest of the world, the European Union uses 30-year old ‘precautionary principle’ to regulate GMOs and gene editing, effectively banning them. Here is a primer
Unlike most of the rest of the world, the European Union uses 30-year old ‘precautionary principle’ to regulate GMOs and gene editing, effectively banning them. Here is a primer


The European Union (EU) has been at the forefront of the debate around genetically modified organisms (GMOs), with the region implementing a range of measures to limit their presence in the food chain. In recent years, the EU has adopted a precautionary approach to GMOs, leading to a range of bans and restrictions on the cultivation, import, and sale of GM crops and food products.
This is due in large part to the possibility of harm to human and animal health as well as a reduction in plant diversity. In 2015, a European Commission rule gave EU countries the ability to opt out of growing GMO crops, with Austria, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Poland, and Scotland among the major countries to do so. Europeans oppose GMOs primarily because they believe that the benefit to agriculture and food production is weak or nonexistent, while the risks are substantial.
Germany, Austria, France, Italy, Poland, and Scotland were the major countries that chose not to grow GMOs, as were Austria, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Poland, and Scotland. There are countries outside of the EU that oppose GMOs in addition to those in the EU.
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) have been approved for use in only 19 countries of the 27 member states of the European Union. As a result of the European Commission’s call for national referendums, each EU country is required to vote on whether or not to allow GMO crops to be grown
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta