Viewpoint: Another science review challenges activist claim that glyphosate in urine poses heath dangers
Viewpoint: Another science review challenges activist claim that glyphosate in urine poses heath dangers


CBS News recently reported on a new government study that found glyphosate in more than 80% of urine tested from a representative sample of U.S. children and adults.
Out of context, many people would find this news alarming. Let’s take a closer look.
The amount of glyphosate found in the urine samples indicates very low exposure levels for the participants of the study. There is no evidence those levels of glyphosate are putting them at risk. Even the highest level of glyphosate recorded in the urine samples corresponds with exposure levels below 0.14% of the safety threshold determined by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
…
To bring further clarity to the issue of glyphosate safety, the Center for Truth in Science recently funded an independent critical review of eight meta-analyses, which was conducted by SciPinion and published in the Journal of Toxicology and Risk Assessment. SciPinion also presented a scientific poster of these findings at the Society of Toxicology meeting in March 2022.
For the critical review, the panel of six senior scientists (with expertise in epidemiology, biostatistics, and toxicology) found low confidence that any of the studies showed a causal link between glyphosate and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
When we put this work in the context of the entire body of existing scientific research on the safety of glyphosate use, consumers can be confident there is no evidence of a relationship between glyphosate and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and that glyphosate is likely to be safe when used as directed.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta