Viewpoint: Are Americans being duped by the organic label and claims by its proponents?
Viewpoint: Are Americans being duped by the organic label and claims by its proponents?


The claim that organic farming produces tastier food is simply unsupported by scientific consensus at this time. However, this claim is based on the fact that due to higher antioxidant levels, the food’s organoleptic qualities like taste, smell, and texture are elevated. Studies found that people consuming food grown conventionally don’t find as much of a difference in taste as those consuming organic food. Studies have also shown that organic food consumers were more than likely to rate organic food’s taste as being better than conventionally produced food. This could be a classic case of confirmation bias. Only time and more research will show if this is true or not.
While some nutrients might be in slightly greater proportion and some anti-nutrients might be in a lower proportion compared to conventional farm produce, the claim that organically produced food is somehow safer and healthier than its conventional counterpart is again scientifically unsupported.
The “Organic” badge is quite lucrative for businesses and corporations, so they are trying to monopolize that market by having lobbyists inside the certifying authorities who will then lobby the government officials staffing these bodies. As the days go by, it’s getting harder and harder to tell lies from the truth. Hence, the onus is on the consumer to verify any claims made for or against any health benefits that a product may or may not have.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta