Viewpoint: Can we trust corporate ‘regenerative farming’ pledges?
Viewpoint: Can we trust corporate ‘regenerative farming’ pledges?


People latch onto words and then casually throw them around like they know what it means. The most common — and obvious — is the line that “organic farmers don’t use pesticides.” Well, Karen, actually…
Most often this happens with the latest, trendiest fads. Whether most people know it, those fads are usually picked up by marketing companies, who develop entire campaigns around them. That’s how I end up with emails from random companies eager to share their commitment to whatever trend.
The marketer again told me all the right stuff. Regenerative agriculture means farmers are economically viable and able to invest in soil health, clean water, and strong ecosystems. That reaching a goal like that means farms will look different depending on climates, soils, and other factors. And that the company would consult with crop specialists with expertise in the local areas where their wheat is grown.
Those are all fantastic things! It’s what I’ve said as an agriculture writer over the last decade! But it completely misses the point: Farmers are already doing this stuff without a fancy label or neat certification. Farmers want to use the best practices that will sustain their farm over the long term, both environmentally and economically. It’s just good business.
But this is what people want to hear: We’re sourcing all of our wheat from farmers that use regenerative practices! Why? Because of the almighty virtue signaling!
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta