Viewpoint: Climate crisis forces Europe to reconsider technology-rejectionist food and farming policies
Viewpoint: Climate crisis forces Europe to reconsider technology-rejectionist food and farming policies


Experts are advocating the use of new strains of gene-edited crops that are capable of surviving the punishing heat waves and drought sweeping across Europe. However, the EU has been cautious about the use of GMOs in the past, fearing the effect such plants can have on ecosystems and population health. While the European Commission has recently hinted its support of gene-editing techniques, these technologies still elicit fierce opposition. But where critics lack firm scientific evidence to justify their gene editing fears, encouraging results are emerging from the other side of the aisle.
The EU can fuel the transition to climate-resilient farming through the combination of a science-based, innovative regulatory environment and robust funding and technical support schemes to assist farmers. Encouragingly, there are signs that the climate crisis is forcing the EU to see the light. EU agriculture ministers are already advocating for the bloc to relax rules on GMOs to allow the use of gene-editing in the combat against drought and declining soil fertility, while the European Commission has argued that existing EU gene-editing legislation is not keeping pace with scientific developments.
If the extreme weather of the past year has made one thing clear, it’s that the climate crisis is not going away.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta