Viewpoint: Environmental activists promote myth that farmers over-apply pesticides on US farmland
Viewpoint: Environmental activists promote myth that farmers over-apply pesticides on US farmland


Activist groups and other organizations that go after conventional agriculture will lead you to believe that farmers are spraying the world to death. This notion is centered around pesticides, the overarching term for herbicides, insecticides, nematicides, fungicides, and other chemicals that are used to protect agricultural crops (and other plants) against pests and disease. The United States, the world’s second-largest agricultural producer, applies about 1 billion pounds of pesticides throughout the country every year.
One billion pounds sounds like a lot, but in reality, it isn’t.
Even if all of those 1 billion pounds of pesticides were applied to only agriculture lands (which they aren’t), it still works out to be less than 1.2 pounds of pesticides for each acre of farmland.
Additionally, because pesticides are expensive, farmers typically can’t afford to overapply! Even the “cheap” ones will cost you nearly $10 an acre to purchase, not to mention the fuel and labor needed to apply them. Farming is a business, and additional expenses, even ones as seemingly small as $10/acre, could make or break the budget that year (the average size of a U.S. farm is 445 acres). Over-application of pesticides is simply not an option for many farmers; it doesn’t help the crops, and it hurts farmers’ pockets.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta