Viewpoint: Environmental Working Group’s ‘Dirty Dozen’ scaremongering
Viewpoint: Environmental Working Group’s ‘Dirty Dozen’ scaremongering — Consumers reject fear-based environmentalist disinformation


Consumers encounter so many mixed messages on produce, ranging from the Dirty Dozen‘s disinformation to the just-eat-your-veggies slogan. How do we know if these messages are resonating with people? And maybe more importantly–who’s winning?
A recent survey by the Alliance for Food and Farming shows that consumers are increasingly confident about produce safety. Overall, consumer concerns about produce safety declined by 20 percent since 2016. Over that same time, consumer concerns over pesticide residues has decreased by 10 percent.
Based on the results, AFF concluded that consumers respond favorably to consistent, science-based information, especially in response to disinformation. So when you share a post from your favorite ag blogger debunking the Dirty Dozen, it really is changing minds!
The survey also shows that consumers trust farmers to tell them the truth about agriculture and growing food. And people generally have trust in government regulations to protect public health. Altogether, the results is that consumer confidence is produce safety is growing!
It’s so encouraging to get statistical feedback showing that “agvocating” efforts really are helping. Because at the end of the day, that’s why I do all of this. I want everyone to have the trust, confidence, and security knowing that our food supply is safe, nutritious, and healthy.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta