Viewpoint: EPA’s crackdown on safe-as-used atrazine weedkiller in midst of global food crisis will send grocery store prices even higher
Viewpoint: EPA’s crackdown on safe-as-used atrazine weedkiller in midst of global food crisis will send grocery store prices even higher


Last month, the [Environmental Protection Agency’s] comment period closed on its proposal to impose new restrictions on an important product for farmers growing corn, sorghum and sugarcane. It’s a herbicide called atrazine. When applied, it prevents weeds from photosynthesizing. Farmers in the United States have used atrazine for more than 60 years. And the EPA’s regular and routine scientific assessments have consistently found that its use is safe for humans and the environment, even at application levels much higher than commonly used today.
For many U.S. farmers, including those in America’s Corn Belt, the EPA’s new rules equate to an outright ban. The choice will exacerbate the food-supply squeeze as farmers are forced to observe EPA’s costly new measures, reduce their overall corn acreage or stop producing corn entirely. As with everything, consumers will eventually pay the extra expense.
…
There’s still a chance the EPA can abandon its proposal to curtail the use of atrazine. Farmers, farm organizations, state agriculture departments, governors of corn-producing states and other experts have written to the agency asking them to slow down and reconsider. Anyone who eats has the opportunity to do the same.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta