Viewpoint: EWG’s Dirty Dozen scares parents away from buying fresh produce. Here’s why you should keep serving your kids grapes, guilt-free
Viewpoint: EWG’s Dirty Dozen scares parents away from buying fresh produce. Here’s why you should keep serving your kids grapes, guilt-free


Grapes, strawberries, apples, and peppers make their way into carts and baskets all over the country as parents give themselves a pat on the back for encouraging healthy eating habits. But upon scrolling through news feeds inundated with fearful messages about pesticides, many caregivers are left feeling confused, and even a little guilty about the fruits and vegetables they’re providing.
Each year, the Environmental Working Group (EWG) releases its “dirty dozen” list of produce that they claim contains the highest levels of pesticide residue. With little information given, they urge consumers to limit their exposure by purchasing these products from the organic aisle.
The presence of a pesticide does not make it poisonous. To put the numbers into perspective, a child could consume 340 servings of apple in one day without any effect from pesticides. An adult woman could eat 3,624 individual strawberries without ever worrying about harmful effects. In fact, studies show that if a person ate the 12 “dirty” fruits and vegetables regularly, the exposure to most of the pesticides would be less than 0.01 percent of the level that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) considers even potentially worrisome.
The food and safety regulations put into place by the United States government are rigorous and extensively reviewed. Parents can rest assured that the produce they’re slicing up for snack time is completely safe for consumption and routinely tested to make sure that it falls within maximum pesticide residue limits.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta