Viewpoint: Grim consequences of Greenpeace’s war on biotechnology — Blindness, hunger, and suffering children
Viewpoint: Grim consequences of Greenpeace’s war on biotechnology — Blindness, hunger, and suffering children


A genetically modified rice variety could save the lives of thousands of children. But now Greenpeace has prevented the sowing because of alleged health risks. Typical: The eco-activists care neither about science nor about the common good. Your agenda is completely different.
“This rice could save the lives of millions of children every year,” said the American news magazine “Time” jubilantly 23 years ago about the successful production of golden rice. Using genetic engineering, biochemists had succeeded in developing the rice variety with increased amounts of a vitamin A precursor. Hundreds of thousands of children go blind every year from vitamin A deficiency, about half of them die. Golden rice could prevent misery.
But the project is faltering because Greenpeace and other so-called environmental organizations are torpedoing the Golden Rice with lawsuits in court over alleged risks of the genetically modified seeds – despite criticism from experts. A study in the journal “Environment and Development Economics” nine years ago came to the conclusion that delaying the use of golden rice could have cost one and a half million years of life unnecessarily even then.
[Editor’s note: This article was originally published in German and has been translated and edited for clarity.]
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta