Viewpoint: How Canadian activists are exploiting tort law to try to ban one of the safest herbicides available to farmers
Viewpoint: How Canadian activists are exploiting tort law to try to ban one of the safest herbicides available to farmers


The green campaign to ban glyphosate is a global co-ordinated effort, but in Canada the war on the pesticide is led by an organization called Safe Food Matters, backed by the usual suspects: Environmental Defence, Friends of the Earth and the David Suzuki Foundation. The campaign is a well-funded effort involving millions of dollars over several years of legal proceedings.
The ban-glyphosate campaign is now before a Federal Court in Toronto. Since glyphosate products are constantly up for renewal, the new case is crucial for future policy, agriculture production, food prices and science. Use of the chemical keeps costs down and eliminates the need to plow and till fields, which research suggests reduces carbon emissions.
The activist objective is to force a radical transformation of Health Canada’s regulatory regime from a government-controlled science operation into a new system that would transfer pesticide oversight to an outside panel … that would be more open to the ideology-driven science manipulations favored by activists.
The PMRA’s reports, however, aggressively defend its conclusions that glyphosate is safe, including a categorical 2019 dismissal of the activist attempt to overturn a 2017 approval decision. It documented the flaws in the activist approach to glyphosate health risks. The agency said it “left no stone unturned” in its review of the decision. After a thorough scientific review, “we have concluded that the concerns raised by the objectors could not be scientifically supported when considering the entire body of relevant data.”
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta