Viewpoint: Should Europe stop using pesticides? This binary, all-or-nothing thinking misrepresents the benefits of crop protection chemicals
Viewpoint: Should Europe stop using pesticides? This binary, all-or-nothing thinking misrepresents the benefits of crop protection chemicals


[French Academy of Agriculture Member André Fougeroux:] Long confined to the agricultural environment, crop protection issues now have a societal dimension with legitimate questions about the potential effects on food quality, human health and the environment.
The answer is therefore not binary between all pesticides and zero pesticides. Prohibiting all pesticides amounts to considering that they bring only inconvenience and no benefit, which is incorrect. Progress has been made towards reducing use, the tonnage of products used in France has gone from 120,000 T in 1999 to 67,000 T, and Europe has gone from more than 800 active substances to about 400 today. This development is complemented by improvements in practice thanks to more targeted applications, lower intrinsic toxicity of products, the development of biocontrol, etc. This progress is a necessity so that European farmers can combine all the solutions at their disposal, including use of pesticides with caution and moderation to deal with pest damage, diseases or weeds that have not diminished. It is therefore a question of aiming for a 100% reduction in the potential impacts of pesticides rather than a 100% reduction in use.
[Editor’s note: This article has been translated from French and edited for clarity.]
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta