Viewpoint: Why an EU ban on crop pesticide exports based on the misguided precautionary principle will hurt global farming
Viewpoint: Why an EU ban on crop pesticide exports based on the misguided precautionary principle will hurt global farming


In France, on September 10, 2020, Le Monde headlined: ”The EU has authorized the export of more than 80,000 tonnes of pesticides which are nevertheless prohibited within the Union.“ The [hook of the article] evoked their “very high toxicity”.
The importing States were obviously not of the same opinion, and these pesticides have long been authorized in the EU.
As part of its Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability – Towards a Toxics-Free Environment , published on 14 October 2020, [the European Commission] announced that the European Union will “lead by example and, respecting its international commitments, will ensure that hazardous chemicals banned in the European Union are not produced for export, including by amending applicable legislation where necessary”.
The Luddites obviously rejoiced.
…
At the National Assembly, Ms. Lise Magnier (UDI) wondered about “the future of French companies producing plant protection products that we do not use in Europe, and the consequences… on jobs in French companies. ”
It may sound selfish.
But it is just as selfish to want to impose our ideas on the dangers of certain pesticides – to be distinguished from the risks – on third countries which obviously do not want them.
[Editor’s note: This article has been translated from French and edited for clarity.]
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta