‘We’re unashamedly pro-science and pro-innovation’: Scottish politicians debate opposition to gene-edited food
‘We’re unashamedly pro-science and pro-innovation’: Scottish politicians debate opposition to gene-edited food
The [Scottish National Party, or] SNP has long opposed genetic modification of food to protect the “clean, green brand of Scotland’s £15 billion food and drink industry”.
However, scientists have developed a process of gene editing which improves crops using their existing genetics, without introducing the foreign genes more commonly associated with genetic modification.
Stephen Kerr, the Conservative MSP, urged critics to abandon their “scaremongering” about “Frankenstein foods” and get behind gene editing.
The UK government is pursuing a Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill at Westminster to advance the research, marketing and release of gene-edited foods.
Mairi McAllan, Scotland’s environment minister, said the SNP government was open-minded about the benefits of gene-edited crops but accused the UK government of rushing the bill through without consultation.
…
Nearly half of Scottish consumers said they were confident gene-edited foods were safe to eat, compared with about a quarter who thought they were unsafe, according to research co-sponsored by Food Standards Scotland. [Conservative MP Stephen Kerr] urged the SNP to drop its constitutional and populist objections to gene editing.
…
Colin Smyth, Labour’s rural affairs spokesman, said his party is “unashamedly pro-science and pro-innovation but we also believe in good regulation”.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here
 | Videos | More... |
Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
 | Bees & Pollinators | More... |
GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it
Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?
Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
 | Infographics | More... |
Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
 | GMO FAQs | More... |
Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?
How are GMOs labeled around the world?
How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
 | GLP Profiles | More... |
Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’
Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta
