Why smiley-face potatoes and other food with ‘human-like’ features repulse us
Why smiley-face potatoes and other food with ‘human-like’ features repulse us


When food is given human-like features, people do not like to eat it, research from the University of Innsbruck, Austria has found. The study is published in the Journal of Consumer Psychology.
While consumers like to purchase humanised food products like gingerbread men, they prefer not to eat them. Yet ‘cold-hearted’ people who lack empathy or remorse are the exception, the study found.
“By humanising a food product, we grant it the capacity to feel (pain),” says the paper’s author, Roland Schroll an assistant professor in the Faculty of Business and Management.
“Consequently, consumers don’t like to eat such a product because eating it seems immoral.”
Anthropomorphism – attributing human characteristics – has long been a popular marketing strategy for food products (think talking M&Ms, or the Australian company that puts smiley faces on pies).
Three involved advertising featuring both anthropomorphised and regular apples. After seeing the ad featuring an apple with a face, consumers reported lower desire to eat an apple, and said they would enjoy eating an apple less. The exception was people who self-identified as being ‘cold-hearted’.
…
The study suggests that companies or organisations seeking to anthropomorphise food in their marketing or communication should consider whether their goal is to promote consumption or purchase. It issues a warning for those wanting to encourage food consumption: exercise caution with respect to humanising food products.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta